This article attempts to consider the problems of appointment and execution of criminal punishment in the form of arrest. The relevance of the study is due to the specifics of arrest as a type of criminal punishment, on the one hand, and the lack of its real purpose and execution, on the other. The purpose of this work is to determine the significance of arrest in the modern penitentiary policy of the Russian Federation and the prospects for its use as a form of punishment. Scientific points of view are evaluated regarding the issues of execution of arrest and its role in the criminal legislation of the country. It is substantiated that arrest today should be perceived as a full-fledged independent punishment that can achieve the goals of penal legislation. The analysis carried out allows us to draw attention to the need to single out arrest in a separate category, which is a priority in the entire process of appointing, executing and serving criminal sentences.
arrest, punishment, alternative punishments, sentencing, imprisonment, correction of convicts
1. Teoharov A.K., Chestnov A.V. Ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide aresta: problemy i perspektivy // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. 2020. № 4. S. 52-60. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SWLWUU
2. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii. M., 1997. 432 s.
3. Stepashin V.M. Arest kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Vestnik OmGU. Seriya. Pravo. 2011. № 4. S. 130-134. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PIKSRB
4. Kol'cov M.I. O vozmozhnostyah karatel'no-profilakticheskogo vozdeystviya aresta kak vida ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Gosudarstvenno-pravovye issledovaniya. 2018. № 1. S. 218-220. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FEEOLU
5. Evloev N.D. Arest, kak odin iz vidov nakazaniy za neostorozhnye prestupleniya // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2011. № 7. S. 241-243. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OYKLNR
6. Nepomnyaschaya T.V. Mera ugolovnogo nakazaniya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. 384 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QSKEKB
7. Bryuhnov A.A. Nekotorye osobennosti organizacii ispravleniya osuzhdennyh // Penitenciarnaya sistema i obschestvo: opyt vzaimodeystviya: sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Perm', 2020. Tom II. S. 17-19. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PVZFIC
8. Kol'cov M.I., Popova, E.A. O neispol'zovannyh vozmozhnostyah aresta dlya dostizheniya celey nakazaniya // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo. 2019. № 4 (39). S. 257-265. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AQYLHA
9. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o neobhodimosti sohraneniya aresta v chisle vidov ugolovnyh nakazaniy, ustanovlennyh v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2017. № 1(26). S. 90-93. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XXQQUB
10. Zvonov A.V. Analiticheskiy obzor soderzhaniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya na primere aresta // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo. 2017. T. 17. № 1. S. 113-117. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YJVWEJ
